Part I:
- Introduction
- Question 1: How do faculty perceive their roles as academic advisers?
Editor's note: This is the first of five installments of this article.
Introduction
I'd like to begin by posing the seven questions I will answer and by telling you about a series of events that occurred a quarter of a century ago that strengthened the teaching-advising connection for me.
My seven questions are:
- How do faculty perceive their roles as academic advisers?
- What is the linguistic relationship between the words teaching and advising?
- Do effective teachers and effective advisers do the same thing?
- Is there more than one type of academic advising?
- Can academic advising produce active learning?
- Can academic advising increase human capital?
- Can academic advising qualify as a scholarly activity?
When I began my academic career, I was certain that teaching and advising were different activities. I believed that teaching consisted of giving lectures to groups of students in the classroom and then testing them to determine if they had accurately assimilated the information from my lectures and the textbook. I believed that advising consisted of meeting individually with my psychology major advisees in my office to help them choose classes for the following semester in a manner that would allow them to graduate in four years.
As the years passed, this distinction started to blur, and I began to realize that teaching and advising share a great deal in common. For example, my students who did not perform well in my classes often came to my office to seek help in improving their grades. This didn't meet my criteria for teaching because we were in my office, not the classroom, and they came alone, not in groups. But it also didn't meet my criteria for advising because they were my students, not my advisees, and they were concerned about the class in which they were currently enrolled, not about the classes they might enroll in next semester. Apparently I had stumbled into the Twilight Zone where teaching and advising intersect.
Although I had been taught how to teach students in graduate school, I had never been taught how to teach my students how to learn what I was teaching them. As a result, I looked at them seriously and offered them little platitudes like Study harder, or Read the book more than once, or Study with someone else in the class. They would leave my office, promising to follow my advice, but their grades seldom improved. My solution to this problem was to enroll in How to Study in College, a continuing education course offered at a local university in which I learned strategies to
- listen actively,
- take useful notes,
- read a textbook for maximum comprehension,
- prepare for and take different types of tests, and
- manage study time for optimum efficiency.
Although my graduate education in memory and cognition had provided the rationale for many of these strategies (e.g., elaborative rehearsal and depth of processing), I had never heard these principles put to such valuable use in an educational context.
Upon completion of this class, I began to insert the information I learned from it into my lectures in ways that would help my students realize that a better understanding of their own cognitive processes (i.e., metacognitive skills) would enable them to learn academic material more successfully. At this point, I started to realize that the distinction between teaching and advising was neither as strong nor as valid as I had once believed. As my career continued, and I became professionally active in teaching and advising organizations, I began to understand that teachers who make this distinction may be doing so in a manner that is detrimental to their students, to their advisees, and to their own professional development.
But, do all teachers share my interest in and enthusiasm for academic advising? To answer this question, let's investigate how faculty perceive their roles as academic advisers.
1. How do faculty perceive their roles as academic advisers?
According to a series of national surveys conducted by American College Testing, faculty provide the majority of academic advising in colleges and universities (ACT, 1979, 1983, 1988). However, faculty perceptions of their advising roles are far from simple and are often rather disturbing as characterized by an unsettling statement on the first page of the chapter on advising written by Mark Ware that appears in Tom McGovern's Handbook for Enhancing Undergraduate Education in Psychology (1993). This statement is: Although theory, research, and practical applications permeate the advising literature, most academic psychologists appear relatively uninterested in advising-related activities and outcomes (p.47).
Ware provided a clue to this enigma when he cited Larsen and Brown (1986) who found that when faculty were asked to respond to statements about the adequacy of rewards for advising, the consideration of advising when giving merit raises, and the role of advising in promotion and tenure evaluation (p. 62), forty-eight to seventy-two percent of them disagreed strongly with these statements. Other clues to this puzzle are
- that students rate academic advising as their most used, but one of their lowest rated, campus services;
- the dramatic increase of college and university enrollments beginning in the 1950s;
- an equally striking increase in the demographic heterogeneity of the population of students in higher education;
- an increase in the popularity of psychology as a major; and
- a dearth of information on advising in the teaching literature (e.g., of the 1,680 articles that have appeared in Teaching of Psychology, only 13 have been on the topic of
advising).
It is no wonder that faculty have given academic advising such short shrift. It is an activity for which they
- lack information,
- are inadequately rewarded,
- are not always appreciated, and
- are called upon to do in increasing amounts with a rapidly expanding and diversified clientele.
McGovern (1993) lent support to the last of these obstacles when he said, Understanding developmental issues and teaching problem-solving strategies to students who differ in gender, age, ethnicity, patterns of enrollment, and prior academic and life experiences are significant challenges (p. 222).
Titley and Titley (1982) put their tongues squarely in their cheeks and produced the following fictitious adviser's rule, which appears facetious on the surface, but which may unfortunately ring true for many faculty who have served as academic advisers.
Each faculty member shall be assigned a number of undergraduate students as his or her advisees and shall, with a minimum expenditure of time, effort, and caring, answer whatever trivial questions they might have, inform them of what courses they must take to graduate in whatever major they've chosen (however capricious that choice may be), and be available, if possible, to sign necessary registration forms. The faculty shall also be aware that, for themselves, advising is primarily a perfunctory clerical duty and a minor academic activity relative to teaching, research, and one's own career development, and that there shall be little or no reward or recognition for the performance of advising activities, save for the occasionally expressed appreciation of a grateful, well-advised student. (p. 46)
It was perceptions like these that lead MacLean (1953, p. 357) to state, Advising is a process with a long and dignified history in college and university. At the same time, involving as it often does tedious clerical work combined with hit-and-run conferences with students on curricula, it is a most cordially hated activity by the majority of college teachers.
This affective juxtaposition regarding faculty perceptions of advising is echoed in the following student responses to a campus-wide advising evaluation form that asked them to complete the sentence: Advisers are __________. Their responses were: friends, helpful, uninformed, doing their best, working overtime, necessary, teachers, counselors, knowledgeable, a drag, problem solvers, nervous, listeners, the ones who have all your information but don't remember your name, and too busy (cited in Crockett, 1978). Perhaps Hardee (1970, p. 27) said it best when he stated, Faculty advising is dignified and derided, much desired but often denigrated, done well and done ill.
Does academic advising deserve such vilification from teachers? To begin to answer this question, let's first gain a better understanding of the linguistic relationship between the words teaching and advising.
Editor's note: This question is answered in Part II of this article, which was published on February 26, 2001.
References
ACT. (1979, 1983, 1988). National survey on advising. Iowa City: American College Test Program.
Appleby, D. C. (1989). The microcomputer as an academic advising tool. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 156-159.
Appleby, D. C. (1990). Faculty and student perceptions of irritating behaviors in the college classroom. The Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 8, 41-46.
Appleby, D. C. (1997). The psychology handbook. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Appleby, D. C. (1997, February). The seven wonders of the academic advising world. Keynote address presented at the Southeastern Conference on the Teaching of Psychology, Marietta, GA.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Benjamin, L. T., Jr. (1991). Personalization and active learning in the large introductory class. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 68-74.
Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorship. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brewer, C. L. (1993). Curriculum. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 161-182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bruner, J. (1966). The process of education. New York: Atheneum.
Carberry, J., Baker, M., & Prescott, D. (1986). Applying cognitive development theory in the advising setting. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 6, 13-18.
Carneval, A. P., Gainer, L. I., & Meltzer, A. S. (1988). Workplace basics: The skills employers want. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Labor and the American Society for Training and Development.
Chickering, A. & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3-7.
Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Crockett, D. S. (Ed.). (1978). Academic advising: A resource document. Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
Crookston, B. B. (1972). A developmental view of academic advising as teaching. Journal of College Student Personnel, 13, 12-17.
Diamond, R., & Adams, B. (1995). Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2001. New Directions for Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eble, K. E. (1988). The craft of teaching: A guide to mastering the professor's art. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ediger, M. (1992). Professors as student advisors. College Student Journal, 26, 365-367.
Ender, S. C., Winston, R. B., & Miller, T. K. (1984). Academic advising reconsidered. In R. B. Winston, Jr., T. K. Miller, S. C. Ender, T. J. Grites, & Associates (Eds.), Developmental academic advising (pp. 3-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Erickson, B. L, & Strommer, D. W. (1991). Teaching college freshmen. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Fretz, B. R. (1993). The compleat scholar: Faculty development for those who teach psychology. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 93-122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Frost, S. H. (1991). Fostering the critical thinking of college women through academic advising and faculty contact. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 356-359.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Glennen, R. E. (1975). Intrusive college counseling. College Student Journal, 9, 2-4.
Glennen, R. E., Farren, P. J., & Vowell, F. N. (1996). How advising and retention of students improves fiscal stability. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 16, 38-41.
Gordon, V. N. (1988). Developmental advising. In W. R. Habley (Ed.). Status and future of academic advising: Problems and promise (pp. 107-118). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
Gordon, V. N. (1992). The handbook of academic advising. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Grites, T. J. (1994). From principle to practice: Pain or gain? National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 80-84.
Hagen, P. L. (1994). Academic advising as dialectic. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 85-88.
Halpern, D. F. (1997). Scholarship in Psychology: A Paradigm for the 21st Century. (Available from Diane F. Halpern, Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernadino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernadino, CA 92407).
Halpern, D. F. (1993). Targeting outcomes: Covering your assessment concerns and needs. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 23-46). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hardee, M. D. (1970). Faculty advising in colleges and universities. American College Personnel Association Monograph: Student Personnel Services, No. 9.
Heath, D. (1968). Growing up in college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Herbstrith, J., Mauer, B., & Appleby, D. C. (1990, April). Applicant characteristics valued by graduate programs in psychology. Paper presented at the Mid-America Undergraduate Psychology Research Conference, Indianapolis.
Hettich, P. (1998). Learning skills for college and career. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Howard, A., Pion, G. M., Gottfredson, G. D., Falttau, P. E., Oskamp, S., Pfafflin, S. M., Bray, D. W, & Burstein, A. G. (1986). The changing face of American psychology. American Psychologist, 41, 1311-1327.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kramer, H. C. (1983). Advising: Implications for faculty development. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 3, 25-31.
Kramer, G. L., Tanner, J. S., & Peterson, E. D. (1995). Faculty mentoring: A key to first-year student success. In M. Upcraft & G. Kramer (Eds.). First-year academic advising: Patterns in the present, pathways to the future (pp. 63-67). Columbia, SC: National Center for the Freshmen Year Experience & Students in Transition.
Laff, N. S. (1994). Reconsidering the developmental view of advising: Have we come a long way? National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 46-49.
Larsen, M D., & Brown, B. M. (1986). Rewards for academic advising: An evaluation. In D. S. Crockett (Ed.), Advising skills, techniques, and resources. (pp. 349-359). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
MacLean, M. S. (1953). Counseling and the Tower of Babel. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 31, 357-362.
Marian College Course Catalog: 1977-1999. (1997). (Available from Marian College, 3200 Cold Spring Road, Indianapolis, IN 46222-1997).
Mathie, V. A. (1993). Promoting active learning in psychology classes. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 183-214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McGovern, T. V. (1993). Transforming undergraduate psychology. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 217-238). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Miller, M. A., & Alberts, B. (1994). Developmental advising: Where teaching and learning intersect. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 43-45.
Morgan, B. L., & Korschgen, A. J. (1998). Majoring in psych? Career options for psychology undergraduates. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Newman, J. H. (1947/1852). The idea of a university. New York: Longmans Green.
O'Banion, T. (1994). An academic advising model. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 10-16.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget. J. (1964). Judgment and reasoning in the child. Patterson, NJ: Littlefield Adams.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Puente, A. E. (1993). Toward a psychology of variance: Increasing the presence and understanding of ethnic minorities in psychology. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 71-92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ramos, B. (1994). O'Banion revisited: Now more than ever. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 89-91.
Roget's thesaurus of English words and phrases. (1994). United Kingdom: Longman Group UK Limited.
Rooney, M. (1994). Back to the future: Crookston and O'Banion revisited. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 14, 35-38.
Rosenstock, L. (1991). The walls come down: The reunification of vocational and academic education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 434-436.
Ryan, C. C. (1992). Advising as teaching. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 12, 4-8.
Schlossberg, N. K., Lynch, A. Q., & Chickering, A. W. (1989). Improving higher education environments for adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shaffer, L. S. (1997). A human capital approach to academic advising. National Academic Advising Association Journal, 17, 5-12.
Super, D. E., & Nevill, D. D. (1984). Work role salience as a determinant of career maturity in high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25, 255-270.
Titley, R. W., & Titley, B. S. (1982). Academic advising: The neglected dimension in designs for undergraduate education. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 1, 45-49.
Ware, M. E. (1993). Developing and improving advising: Challenges to prepare students for life. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 47-70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Weiten, W. (1993). From isolation to community: Increasing communication and collegiality among psychology teachers. In T. V. McGovern (Ed.), Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 123-159). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Woods, P. J., & Wilkerson, C. S. (1987). Is psychology the major for you? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.