Micro-affirmations in Academic Advising: Small Acts, Big Impact

Authors

  • Candice Powell University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Cynthia Demetriou University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Annice Fisher University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26209/mj1561286

Abstract

Rowe (2008) defined micro-affirmations as small acts in the workplace fostering inclusion, listening, comfort, and support for people who may feel unwelcome or invisible in an environment. Within the context of higher education, micro-affirmations can communicate to students that they are welcome, visible, and capable of performing well in the college environment. Micro-affirmations have the potential to fuel optimal student development and thriving in college. Academic advising offers an opportunity to apply micro-affirmations to the college context and to student, faculty, and staff dynamics. This article expands upon Rowe's ideas to suggest that micro-affirmations can become frequent, intentional practice within academic advising to positively impact student engagement and, ultimately, enhance retention and graduation outcomes. This article will also suggest ways to communicate and apply micro-affirmations in academic advising.

Author Biographies

Candice Powell, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Candice Powell, M.Ed., is the retention specialist in the Office of Undergraduate Education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. She can be reached at candicef@email.unc.edu

Cynthia Demetriou, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Cynthia Demetriou, Ed.M., is the director for retention in the Office of Undergraduate Education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. She can be reached at cyndem@email.unc.edu

Annice Fisher, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Annice Fisher, M.Ed., is the transfer student coordinator in the Office of Undergraduate Education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. She can be reached at fisherae@email.unc.edu.

References

Appleby, D. (2001, February 5). The teaching-advising connection. The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal. Retrieved from http://dus.psu.edu/mentor

Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.

Bloom, J. L., & Martin, N. A. (August 29, 2002). Incorporating appreciative inquiry into academic advising. The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal. Retrieved http://dus.psu.edu/mentor

Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537–550.

Demetriou, C., & Schmitz-Sciborski, A. (2011). Integration, motivation, strengths and optimism: Retention theories past, present and future. In R. Hayes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th National Symposium on Student Retention (pp. 300–312). Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma.

Drake, J. K. (2011). The role of academic advising in student retention and persistence. About Campus, 16(3), 8–12.

Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Fowler, P. R., & Boylan, H. R. (2010). Increasing student success and retention: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(2), 2–10.

Franklin, A. J. (2004). From brotherhood to manhood: How Black men rescue their relationships and dreams from the invisibility syndrome. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Glennen, R. E., & Vowell, F. N. (Eds.). (1995). Academic advising as a comprehensive campus process. NACADA Monograph Series (No. 2). Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising Association.

Hale, M. D., Graham, D. L., & Johnson, D. M. (2009). Are students more satisfied with academic advising when there is congruence between current and preferred advising styles? College Student Journal, 43(2), 313–324.

Hamilton, S. F., Hamilton, M. A., & Pittman, K. (2004) Principles for youth development. In S. F. Hamilton & M. A. Hamilton (Eds.), The youth development handbook: Coming of age in American communities (pp. 3–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hunter, M., & White, E. (2004, March–April). Could fixing academic advising fix higher education? About Campus, 9, 20–25.

Kuh, G. D. (2012, October 31). What matters to student success. [PowerPoint slides]. Presentation at the National Symposium on Student Retention National Conference, New Orleans, LA.

Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., and Witt, E. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Lau, L. (2003). Institutional factors affecting student retention. Education, 124(1), 126–136.

Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis of student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549–565.

McClellan, J. L. (2007). The adviser as servant: The theoretical and philosophical relevance of servant leadership. NACADA Journal, 27(2), 41–49.

Museus, S., & Ravello, J. N. (2010). Characteristics of academic advising that contribute to racial and ethnic minority student success at predominantly white institutions. NACADA Journal, 30(1), 47–58.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insight from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Robbins, S., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Akamigbo, A., Saltonstall, M., Campbell, R., … Gore, P. (2009). Associations of resource and service utilization, risk level, and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 101–118. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9106-7

Ross, H. (2011). Reinventing diversity: Transforming organizational community to strengthen people, purpose, and performance. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.

Rowe, M. 2008. Micro-affirmations and micro-inequities. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, 1(1), 45–48.

Schreiner, L. A. (2010). The "thriving quotient": A new vision for student success. About Campus, 15(2), 2–10.

Scully, M., & Rowe, M. (2009). Bystander training within organizations. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, 2(1), 89–95.

Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2012). Advisers as interaction designers. NACADA Journal, 32(1), 12–17.

Solórzano, D. G., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. J. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.

Sue, D. W. (2004). Whiteness and ethnocentric monoculturalism: Making the "invisible" visible. American Psychologist, 59, 759–769.

Sue, D., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271–286.

Yosso, T. J., Smith, W. A., Ceja, M., & Solórzano, D. G. (2009). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate for Latina/o undergraduates. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 659–690.

Young-Jones, A. D., Burt, T. D., Dixon. S., & Hawthorne, M. J. (2013). Academic advising: Does it really impact student success? Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 7–19.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 15 (2013): The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).