Separate Kingdoms: Academic Advisers’ Perceptions of College Athletes and Athletic Departments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26209/mj2261353Keywords:
academic advising, academic advisers, perceptions, college athletes, athletic department cultureAbstract
Existing scholarship suggests that faculty, staff, and non-athlete students hold negative views of college athletes’ academic abilities, but few studies have examined academic advisers’ perceptions. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore primary role advisers’ views of college athletes and the athletic department at their institutions. One hundred and fifty-five academic advisers at NCAA Division I Power 5 institutions answered an open-ended survey question asking for general thoughts about advising student-athletes and working with athletic departments. Our analysis of the data suggests that academic advisers link athletes’ academic performance to the culture and organization of athletic departments. Specifically, advisers believe (a) college athlete academic motivation varies by sport, (b) time demands make athletes prioritize athletics over academic success, (c) athletic departments enable athletes, and (d) athletic departments are siloed from academic advising. Broadly, these findings reveal that academic advisers do not simply stereotype athletes as “dumb jocks,” which previous scholarship implies they would. Rather, they see poor academic performance as the product of students’ broader cultural and institutional context. These findings suggest that supporting college athletes involves not only combating negative stereotypes, but also building and repairing relationships between academic advisers and athletic departments.
References
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards & blackboards: College athletics and role engulfment. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/adle90436
Anderson, W., Motto, J. S., & Bourdeaux, R. (2014). Getting what they want: Aligning student expectations of advising with perceived advisor behaviors. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 26(1), 27–51. https://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v26/issue1/v26n1-Anderson-Motto-Bourdeaux-FEATURE-ARTICLES.pdf
Bhattacharya, K. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315231747
Comeaux, E. (2010). Racial differences in faculty perceptions of collegiate student-athletes’ academic and post-undergraduate achievement. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.27.4.390
Comeaux, E. (2011). Examination of faculty attitudes toward Division I college student-athletes. College Student Affairs Journal, 30(1), 75–87.
Engstrom, C., & Sedlacek, W. (1991). A study of prejudice toward university student-athletes. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70(1), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01582.x
Engstrom, C., Sedlacek, W., & McEwen, M. (1995). Faculty attitudes toward male revenue and nonrevenue student-athletes. Journal of College Student Development, 36(3), 217–227.
Gaston-Gayles, J. (2004). Examining academic and athletic motivation among student athletes at a Division I university. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2004.0005
Gaston-Gayles, J., & Hu, S. (2009). The influence of student engagement and sport participation on college outcomes among Division I student athletes. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0051
Horner, M. I., Ternes, N., & McLeod, C. M. (2016). Not going pro: On seeking lasting returns from college sports. Journal of Amateur Sport, 2(1), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v2i1.5017
Kuhn, A. P. (2017). Faculty perceptions of student-athlete deviance: A SEC and Big Ten comparison [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
Lawrence, J. H., Hendricks, L. A., & Ott, M. C. (2007). Faculty perceptions of intercollegiate athletics: A national study of faculty at NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision institutions. Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Parsons, J. (2013). Student-athlete perceptions of academic success and athlete stereotypes on campus. Journal of Sport Behavior, 36(4), 400–416.
Rubin, L. M. (2017). Who are athletic advisors? State of the profession. NACADA Journal, 37(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-15-046
Rubin, L. M., & Lewis, W. A. (2020). Collaboration between campus and athletic advisors: Ensuring college athletes’ success. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, Special Issue, 91–124.
Rubin, L. M., & Moreno-Pardo, M. D. (2018). Burnout among student-athlete services professionals. Journal of Higher Education Athletics and Innovation, 1(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2018.1.3.1-25
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Simons, H. D., Bosworth, C., Fujita, S., & Jensen, M. (2007). The athlete stigma in higher education. College Student Journal, 41(2), 251–273.
Simons, H. D., Van Rheenen, D., & Covington, M. D. (1999). Academic motivation and the student athlete. Journal of College Student Development, 40(2), 151–162.
Stokowski, S., Rode, C. R., & Hardin, R. (2016). Academic advisors’ perceptions of student-athletes at NCAA Division-I institutions. The Journal of SPORT, 5(1), 64–92. https://doi.org/10.21038/sprt.2016.0514
Valentine, J. J., & Taub, D. J. (1999). Responding to the developmental needs of student athletes. Journal of College Counseling, 2(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.1999.tb00153.x
Weber, L. J., Sherman, T. M., & Tegano, C. (1990). Faculty perceptions of the sources and types of pressure to assist student-athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7(4), 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.7.4.389
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).