Comparing Undergraduate and Graduate Perspectives of Adviser Interactional Justice, Sociocommunicative Style, and Credibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26209/mj1661266Abstract
The goal of the current study was to further the research findings generated by Wrench and Punyanunt (2004, 2005, 2008), and Punyanunt-Carter and Wrench (2008), which examined the influence of a variety of communication variables in the graduate adviser-advisee interpersonal relationship. The current study examined undergraduate and graduate advisee perceptions of advisers' interactional justice, sociocommunicative style, and credibility. Findings revealed that undergraduate advisees scored higher on adviser assertiveness than did graduate advisees. Moreover, graduate advisees reported higher ratings of adviser trustworthiness and mentoring than did undergraduate advisees.References
Beatty, M. J., & Dobos, J. A. (1992). Relationship between sons' perceptions of fathers' messages and satisfaction in adult sons father relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 277-284.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 155-162.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002) Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50, 58-77.
Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of advisee aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52, 98-113.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimentionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
Creeden, J. E. (1990). Components of good advising: Differences in faculty and student perceptions. NACADA Journal, 10(2), 34-39.
Crookston, B. B. (1972). A developmental view of academic advising as teaching. Journal of College Student Personnel, 13, 12-17.
Ender, S. C. (1994). Impediments to Developmental Advising. NACADA Journal,14( 2), 105-107.
Filson, C., & Whittington, S. M. (2013). Engaging undergraduate students through academic advising. NACTA Journal, 57(4), 10-17.
Gaurdeau, P. (1977). Factor analysis of the BEM Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 299-302.
Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2004). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gordon, V., & Habley, W. R. (Eds.). (2000). Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hart, R. P., Friedrich, G. W., & Brummett, B. (1983). Public communication (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Karr-Lilienthal, L., Lazarowicz, T., McGill, C. M., & Menke, D. (2013). Faculty advisors' attitudes toward undergraduate advising in a college of agriculture and natural sciences: A non-experimental study. NACTA Journal, 57, 35-44.
Kelly, S., & Schweitzer, J. H. (1999). Mentoring within a graduate school setting. College Student Journal, 33, 130-148.
Kramer, G. L. (Ed.). (2003). Faculty advising examined: Enhancing the potential of college faculty advisors. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing.
Luna, G., & Cullen, D. L. (1998). Do graduate students need mentoring? College Student Journal, 32, 322-330.
Mastrodicasa, J. M. (2001, March). But you teach chemistry, how can you advise me at orientation? Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Seattle, WA.
McCroskey, J. C. (1998). An introduction to communication in the classroom (2nd ed.). Acton, MA: Tapestry Press.
McCroskey, J. C. (2001). An introduction to rhetorical communication (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perloff, R. M. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st Century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., & Wrench, J. S. (2008). Advisor-advisee communication three: Organizational communication variables in the graduate advisee-advisor relationships. Education, 1-12.
Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-184.
Richmond, V. P., & Martin, M. M. (1998). Sociocommunicative style and sociocommunicative orientation. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 133-148). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1985). Communication: Apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449-450.
Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1-9.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Toale, M. C. (2001). Teacher clarity and teacher misbehaviors: Relationships with student's affective learning and teacher credibility. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Tuttle, K. N. (2000). Academic advising. New Directions for Higher Education, 111, 15–25.
Ulku-Steiner, B., Kinlaw, C. R., & Kurtz-Cortes, B. (2000). Doctoral student experiences in gender-balanced and male-dominated graduate programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 296-307.
Waldeck, J. H., Orrego, V. O., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1997). Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end. Communication Quarterly, 45, 93-103.
Waters, C. W., Waters, L. K., & Pincus, S. (1977). Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex-typed items for the BEM Sex-Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 567-570.
Wheeless, V. E., & Dierks-Stewart, K. (1981). The psychometric properties of the BEM Sex-Role Inventory: Questions concerning reliability and validity. Communication Quarterly, 29, 173-186.
Wheeless, L. R., & Wheeless, V. E. (1981). Attribution, gender orientation, and reconceptualization, measurement, and research results. Communication Quarterly, 30, 56-66.
Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt, N. M. (2004). Advisor-advisee communication: An exploratory study examining interpersonal communication variables in the graduate advisee-advisor relationship. Communication Quarterly, 52, 224-236.
Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2005). Advisor-advisee communication two: The influence of verbal aggression and humor assessment on advisee perceptions of advisor credibility and affective learning. Communication Research Reports, 22, 303-313.
Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2008). The influence of graduate advisor use of interpersonal humor on graduate students. NACADA, 54-72.
Wrench, J. S., & Richmond, V. P. (2004). Understanding the psychometric properties of the Humor Assessment instrument through an analysis of the relationships between teacher humor assessment and instructional communication variables in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 21, 92-103.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).