Responding to Professor Rating Websites: An Adviser's Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26209/mj1261427Keywords:
advising, academic advising, adviser, advisorAbstract
No Abstract Provided.References
Baldwin, T., & Blattner, N. (2003). Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations: What every faculty member needs to know. College Teaching, 51(1), 27-32.
Blunt, A. (1991). The effects of anonymity and manipulated grades on student ratings of instructors. Community College Review, 18(4). doi:00915521
Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). Ratemyprofessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(6). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=6
Ewing, V. L., Stukas, A. A., & Sheehan, E. P. (2003). Student prejudice against gay male and lesbian lecturers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(5), 569–579.
Felton, J., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2004). Web-based student evaluations of professors: The relations between perceived quality, easiness, and sexiness. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 91–108.
Hamilton, A. (2009). 50 best websites 2008. Time.com. Retrieved from http://search.time.com/results.html
Kindred, R., & Mohammed, S. (2005). "He will crush you like an academic ninja!": Exploring teacher ratings on Ratemyprofessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 9. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/authors.html
Ritter, K. (2008). E-Valuating learning. Rate my professors and public rhetorics of pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 27(3), 259–280.
Silva, K. M, Silva, F. J., Quinn, M. A., Draper, J. N., Cover, K. R., & Munoff, A. A. (2008). Rate my professor: Online evaluations of psychology instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 71–80.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).