Putting Theory into Practice: Implementing a Successful Probation Program

Authors

  • Kimberley Rolf
  • Naomi Craven

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26209/mj1261434

Keywords:

advising, academic advising, adviser, advisor

Abstract

No Abstract Provided.

Author Biographies

Kimberley Rolf

Kimberley Rolf is an academic adviser in the College of Sciences Undergraduate Advising Center for the University of Texas at San Antonio. She can be reached at kimberley.rolf@utsa.edu.

Naomi Craven

Naomi Craven is an academic adviser in the College of Sciences Undergraduate Advising Center for the University of Texas at San Antonio. She can be reached at naomi.craven@utsa.edu.

References

Abelman, R., & Molina, A. (2000). Style and substance revisited: A longitudinal analysis of intrusive intervention. NACADA Journal, 21(1, 2), 32–39.

Gehrke, S., & Wong, J. (2007). Students on academic probation. In L. Huff & P. Jordan (Eds.), Advising special populations (Monograph No. 17, pp. 135–150). Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising Association.

Kirk-Kuwaya, M., & Nishida, D. (2001). Effect of low and high advisor involvement on the academic performance of probation students. NACADA Journal, 21(1, 2), 40–45.

O'Banion, T. (1994). An academic advising model. NACADA Journal, 14(2), 10–16.

Downloads