Curricular Change and the Ship of Theseus
Keywords:curricular change, design thinking, logic of the curriculum, self-authorship, exploratory students, individualized majors
In this essay, I will use the “ship of Theseus” paradox as a thought experiment to tease out what can and should remain the same when a student makes curricular changes. This thought experiment, which questions whether a ship remains the same ship if all of its component parts are changed over time, provides us with a conceptual framework to examine circumstances in which curricular change is the rule and not the exception. Such changes are positive steps in a student’s learning and development, rather than signs of indecision or immaturity. As such, the paradox is useful in helping advisers and mentors think about the student’s curriculum as it evolves and changes over time. I also draw on Aristotle’s four causes of change as conceptual language to navigate the ship of Theseus paradox. I argue that advisers should promote meta-learning through guided reflection in order to maintain a consistent path towards student learning despite curricular change. Finally, the essay culminates with some tools and techniques that prioritize process in pursuit of the kind of meta-learning that supports student development and success.
Aristotle. (1906). Posterior analytics. (G. R. G. Mure, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/posterior.html (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.).
Aristotle. (1930). The physics. (R. P. Hardie & R. K. Gaye, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.html (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.).
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promote self-development. Stylus.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2008). Three elements of self-authorship. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 269–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2016.1121147
Baxter Magolda, M. B., & King, P. M. (2008) Toward reflective conversations: An advising approach that promotes self-authorship. Peer Review, 10(1).
Caplan, B. (2018, January/February). The world might be better off without college for everyone. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/01/whats-college-good-for/546590/
Design Council. (2015a). Design methods for developing services. Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/Design%20methods%20for%20developing%20services.pdf
Design Council. (2015b). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council’s evolved Double Diamond. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
Epstein, D. (2019). Range: Why generalists triumph in a specialized world. Riverhead Books.
Fain, P. (2014, October 28). Big Ten and the next big thing. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/10/28/competency-based-education-arrives-three-major-public-institutions
Georgia State University. (n.d.). Meta majors. Retrieved July 26, 2020, from https://success.gsu.edu/initiatives/meta-majors/
Hart Research Associates. (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2013_EmployerSurvey.pdf
Hart Research Associates. (2018). Fulfilling the American dream: Liberal education and the future of work. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2018EmployerResearchReport.pdf
Hennig, B. (2009). The four causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 106(3), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2016.1121147
Logue, J. (2015, September 11). Un-undeclared. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/09/11/rhode-island-college-aims-improve-retention-meta-majors
Lowenstein, M. (2000, April 14). Academic advising and the “logic” of the curriculum. The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal, 2. http://dus.psu.edu/mentor/old/articles/000414ml.htm
Pizzolato, J. E. (2005). Creating crossroads for self-authorship: Investigating the provocative moment. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0064
Plutarch. (1683). Theseus (J. Dryden, Trans.). The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/theseus.html (Original work published ca. 75 C.E.).
Rhode Island College. (2020, June 3). Exploring majors. Retrieved July 26, 2020, from http://www.ric.edu/Exploring-Majors/Pages/default.aspx
Straumsheim, C. (2016, August 24) Decision time. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/08/24/study-finds-students-benefit-waiting-declare-major
University of Wisconsin. (n.d.). UW Flexible Option. Retrieved July 26, 2020, from https://flex.wisconsin.edu/
U.S. Department of Education. (2017, December). Beginning college students who change their majors within 3 years of enrollment. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018434.pdf
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).